Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: Altec 604 D Enclosures

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    HB Super Moderator
    Altec 604 D Enclosures


    Altec Best's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 10th, 2008
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    4,256
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    16 Post(s)

    Re: Altec 604 D Enclosures

    That's an older review I think GM has done some updates since then.Dunno ? Hopefully he can confirm this or not.

  2. #2
    Inactive Member David Yost's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 10th, 2002
    Posts
    113
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Altec 604 D Enclosures


  3. #3
    Senior Hostboard Member GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2002
    Location
    Chamblee, Ga.
    Posts
    4,967
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    48 Post(s)

    Re: Altec 604 D Enclosures

    Restricting the vent via boundary loading creates a form of band-pass loading [think R-J style reflex loading] and while I'm sure that the wave equations can optimize the gap for 'x' amount of gain, I've never seen it published and even if I did, don?t have a clue how to manipulate it, so I have to find the amount I want empirically. Basically, it lowers tuning due to air mass loading, so can either shorten a vent or increase its area [Av] for a given Fb same as a vented TL [MLTL] does.

    I worked up a simple way to find a minimum gap before it begins to audibly affect speaker response that?s based on speaker base area from empirical data and should have ?run the numbers? before posting as I get a pretty high minimum, so in theory there is some loading going on, lowering tuning [Fb], but would have to be measured or at least listen to test tones to find out how much.

    Then again, this much vent area Vs cab base area makes it almost a simple TL, which by itself would be tuned to ~78.5 Hz, so ignoring floor gain, around 70 Hz may not be that far off. In retrospect, considering its age, I wonder if it?s not tuned same as an early A7, which puts it around 65 Hz, not a high tuning for the early ?50s/604D. This would imply a fairly significant amount of floor gain.

    GM

    Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

  4. #4
    Inactive Member charly1944's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 10th, 2011
    Posts
    39
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Altec 604 D Enclosures

    Thanks David,
    It looks interesting but probably difficult to implement for me.Is the MLTL solution considered as the state of the art solution for a 604? I look forward to getting some guidance from GM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 27936657 times.